联想 IdeaPad 110-15ACL (A8-7410, 高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测体力不足。 联想的这台15.6寸笔记本电脑售价约350欧元（约2558人民币）。它的亮点在1TB硬盘和8GB内存。不过，选购的用户需要接受一颗较慢的处理器和较短的电池续航。Sascha Mölck, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 04/08/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇷🇺 🇮🇹 🇪🇸 AMD Carrizo Laptop / Notebook Windows
Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE (IdeaPad 110 Series)ProcessorAMD A8-7410 4 x 2.2 - 2.5 GHz, Carrizo-LGraphics adapterAMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), Core: 847 MHz, 单通道, Crimson 17.2.1Memory8 GB , DDR3-1600, 单通道, 一个内存槽（已占用）Display15.60 inch 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 100 PPI, BOE NT156WHM-N32, TN LED, glossy: yesMainboardAMD KernCZStorageSeagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, 1024 GB , 850 GB freeSoundcardRealtek ALC235 @ AMD Avalon FCH - High Definition Audio ControllerConnections1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 整合音频接口, Card Reader: SD读卡器, TPM 2.0NetworkingRealTek Semiconductor RTL8101/2/3 Family Fast Ethernet NIC (10/100MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0Optical driveHL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE0NSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 30 x 378 x 265Battery24 Wh Lithium-IonOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 10 Home 64 BitCameraWebcam: 标清Additional featuresSpeakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, Cyberlink Power2Go 8, Cyberlink PowerDVD 14, MS Office 365 (试用), McAfee LiveSafe (试用), 12 Months WarrantyWeight2.2 kg, Power Supply: 168 g
Price349 EuroLinksLenovo homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
Size Comparison
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE Asus F540SA-XX087T Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD DIN A4 ❌
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
ConnectivityRight: DVD burner, cable-lock slot
Left: power-in, One Key Recovery button, HDMI, Fast-Ethernet, USB 2.0 (Type-A), USB 3.1 Gen. 1 (Type-A), combo audio
Front: SD-card reader
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)Asus F540SA-XX087T
33 MB/s +24%Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
26.6 MB/s HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
22.7 MB/s -15%Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
17.8 MB/s -33%maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
39.4 MB/s Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WA
36.7 MB/s -7%HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT
26.6 MB/s -32%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WAIntel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
312 MBit/s +15%Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GEQualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
272 MBit/s iperf3 receive AX12Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GEQualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
315 MBit/s Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WAIntel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
186 MBit/s -41%
265cd/m²252cd/m²251cd/m²254cd/m²253cd/m²235cd/m²235cd/m²238cd/m²228cd/m²
Distribution of brightnessBOE NT156WHM-N32 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 265 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 245.7 cd/m² Minimum: 8.7 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 86 %Center on Battery: 253 cd/m²Contrast: 575:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)ΔE Color 9.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83ΔE Greyscale 11.05 | 0.09-98 Ø5.156% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)38.63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)56.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)37.39% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)Gamma: 2.55Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GETN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBDTN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WATN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"HP 250 G5 Y1V08UTTN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"Asus F540SA-XX087TTN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"Display-6%2%-5%7% Display P3 Coverage37.3935.28 -6%38.04 2%35.43 -5%40.17 7% sRGB Coverage56.253.2 -5%57.2 2%53.3 -5%60 7% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage38.6336.45 -6%39.3 2%36.6 -5%41.54 8%Response Times2%13%1%40% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *5848 ?(26, 22) 17%43 ?(21, 22, Plateau) 26%42.4 ?(14.8, 27.6) 27%20 ?(10, 10) 66% Response Time Black / White *2326 ?(9, 17) -13%23 ?(7, 16, Plateau) -0%28.8 ?(10.8, 18) -25%20 ?(12, 8) 13% PWM Frequency200 ?(90)200 ?(90)Screen-16%-15%-25%9%Brightness middle253225 -11%201 -21%199.8 -21%215 -15%Brightness246246 0%202 -18%199 -19%200 -19%Brightness Distribution8686 0%92 7%85 -1%87 1%Black Level *0.440.46 -5%0.67 -52%0.712 -62%0.26 41%Contrast575489 -15%300 -48%281 -51%827 44%Colorchecker dE 2000 *9.213.57 -48%10.36 -13%13.24 -44%13.07 -42%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *17.6822.91 -30%18.88 -7%21.52 -22%16.06 9%Greyscale dE 2000 *11.0515.07 -36%11.06 -0%13.33 -21%4.34 61%Gamma2.55 86%2.27 97%2.56 86%1.69 130%2.48 89%CCT11451 57%22046 29%11368 57%15879 41%7212 90%Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)3634 -6%36 0%33.8 -6%38 6%Color Space (Percent of sRGB)5653 -5%57 2%53.4 -5%60 7%Total Average (Program / Settings)-7% /
-11%0% /
-8%-10% /
-18%19% /
13%* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness settingThe display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.
The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8350 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise↘ ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise↘ ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit1917
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit6169
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit2819
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit50 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit166 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit17.25 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit98 %
Help... in comparison
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R10 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.0 | JetStream 1.1 Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64BitLenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBDIntel Core i3-5005U
82 Points +64%Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WAIntel Pentium N4200
53 Points +6%Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-LAMD A8-7410
52 Points +4%Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGEAMD A8-7410
52 Points +4%Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GEAMD A8-7410
50 Points HP 250 G5 Y1V08UTIntel Celeron N3060
37 Points -26%Asus F540SA-XX087TIntel Celeron N3050
33 Points -34% CPU Multi 64BitLenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBDIntel Core i3-5005U
210 Points +27%Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-LAMD A8-7410
174 Points +5%Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGEAMD A8-7410
174 Points +5%Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GEAMD A8-7410
166 Points Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WAIntel Pentium N4200
165 Points -1%HP 250 G5 Y1V08UTIntel Celeron N3060
68 Points -59%Asus F540SA-XX087TIntel Celeron N3050
61 Points -63%Cinebench R10
Shading 32BitLenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBDIntel Core i3-5005U
5601 Points +99%Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WAIntel Pentium N4200
3223 Points +14%Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GEAMD A8-7410
2819 Points Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGEAMD A8-7410
2681 Points -5%HP 250 G5 Y1V08UTIntel Celeron N3060
2510 Points -11%Asus F540SA-XX087TIntel Celeron N3050
2265 Points -20%Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-LAMD A8-7410
1746 Points -38% Rendering Multiple CPUs 32BitLenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBDIntel Core i3-5005U
6953 Points +13%Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GEAMD A8-7410
6169 Points Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WAIntel Pentium N4200
5149 Points -17%Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-LAMD A8-7410
4665 Points -24%Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGEAMD A8-7410
4428 Points -28%HP 250 G5 Y1V08UTIntel Celeron N3060
2256 Points -63%Asus F540SA-XX087TIntel Celeron N3050
1978 Points -68%Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core ScoreLenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBDIntel Core i3-5005U
1907 Points +46%Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WAIntel Pentium N4200
1395 Points +7%Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GEAMD A8-7410
1307 Points Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-LAMD A8-7410
1205 Points -8%Asus F540SA-XX087TIntel Celeron N3050
865 Points -34% 32 Bit Multi-Core ScoreAcer Aspire ES1-533-P7WAIntel Pentium N4200
4563 Points +16%Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBDIntel Core i3-5005U
4093 Points +4%Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GEAMD A8-7410
3918 Points Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-LAMD A8-7410
3456 Points -12%Asus F540SA-XX087TIntel Celeron N3050
1583 Points -60%Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core ScoreAcer Aspire ES1-533-P7WAIntel Pentium N4200
1581 Points +17%Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GEAMD A8-7410
1356 Points 64 Bit Multi-Core ScoreAcer Aspire ES1-533-P7WAIntel Pentium N4200
4364 Points +26%Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GEAMD A8-7410
3460 Points JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WAIntel Pentium N4200
90.1 Points +19%Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GEAMD A8-7410
75.5 Points Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBDIntel Core i3-5005U
75.1 Points -1%Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGEAMD A8-7410
71.2 Points -6%HP 250 G5 Y1V08UTIntel Celeron N3060
58.5 Points -23%Asus F540SA-XX087TIntel Celeron N3050
51.1 Points -32%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1956 pointsHelp
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBDHD Graphics 5500, 5005U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024
2720 Points +39%Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WAHD Graphics 505, Pentium N4200, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
1993 Points +2%Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGERadeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0
1960 Points 0%Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-LRadeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
1958 Points 0%Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GERadeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
1956 Points HP 250 G5 Y1V08UTHD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
1661 Points -15%Asus F540SA-XX087THD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Seagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142
1598 Points -18%
HD Tune
CrystalDiskMark 3.0Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035Transfer Rate Minimum:
1.3 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum:
130.7 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average:
96.1 MB/s
Access Time:
19.8 ms
Burst Rate:
104 MB/s
CPU Usage:
3.5 %
HD Tune
CrystalDiskMark 3.0Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035Sequential Read:
92.1 MB/s
Sequential Write:
88.5 MB/s
512K Read:
32.94 MB/s
512K Write:
26.71 MB/s
4K Read:
0.372 MB/s
4K Write:
0.283 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
0.921 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
0.473 MB/s
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GESeagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBDSeagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WAToshiba MQ01ABD100HP 250 G5 Y1V08UTSamsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHPAsus F540SA-XX087TSeagate Momentus Thin ST500LT012-1DG142CrystalDiskMark 3.038%50%4252%17% Read Seq92.1111.3 21%107.6 17%484.4 426%98.3 7% Write Seq88.5107.2 21%96.6 9%139.2 57%89.8 1% Read 51232.9435.11 7%22.5 -32%338.1 926%20.79 -37% Write 51226.7141.3 55%24.23 -9%134.7 404%34.84 30% Read 4k0.3720.398 7%0.474 27%17.21 4526%0.335 -10% Write 4k0.2830.764 170%1.089 285%31.52 11038%0.619 119% Read 4k QD320.9210.761 -17%0.861 -7%94.6 10171%0.789 -14% Write 4k QD320.4730.991 110%31.08 6471%0.641 36%
3DMark 11 Performance
970 pointsHelp... in comparison
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBDIntel HD Graphics 5500, Intel Core i3-5005U
957 Points +6%Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GEAMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410
899 Points Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGEAMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410
782 Points -13%Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-LAMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410
744 Points -17%Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WAIntel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200
624 Points -31%Asus F540SA-XX087TIntel HD Graphics (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3050
384 Points -57%HP 250 G5 Y1V08UTIntel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3060
382 Points -58%
lowmed.highultraWorld of Warcraft (2005)
75.8
52.4
BioShock Infinite (2013)
34.6
18.5
15.9
GTA V (2015)
24.6
20.7
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
26.2
21
XCOM 2 (2016)
9.9
2.5
Far Cry Primal (2016)
10
5
The Division (2016)
12.3
7
Hitman 2016 (2016)
7.2
4.1
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)
7.7
5.6
Battlefield 1 (2016)
13.2
9.3
Civilization 6 (2016)
18.3
7
Farming Simulator 17 (2016)
41.5
28.3
Titanfall 2 (2016)
17.6
14.7
Dishonored 2 (2016)
7.1
5.1
Resident Evil 7 (2017)
19.8
11.9
For Honor (2017)
14.5
4.9
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017)
8.8
2.9
BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GEAMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410
34.6 fps Lenovo G51-35 80M8002HGEAMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410
33.7 fps -3%Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WAIntel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200
23.7 fps -32%Toshiba Satellite C55D-C-10P Carrizo-LAMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A8-7410
23 fps -34%HP 250 G5 Y1V08UTIntel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3060
18.1 fps -48%Asus F540SA-XX087TIntel HD Graphics (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3050
17.5 fps -49%
Noise Level
Idle
30.9 / 30.9 / 31 dB(A)HDD
32.3 dB(A)DVD
37.3 / dB(A)Load
31.8 / 31.9 dB(A)
30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A)
Max. LoadIdle
32 °C25.7 °C23.3 °C 32.9 °C26.6 °C23.6 °C 31.1 °C29.8 °C30.2 °C
Maximum: 32.9 °CAverage: 28.4 °C
23.1 °C23.6 °C27.9 °C23.5 °C25 °C34.5 °C25.8 °C26.8 °C33.5 °C
Maximum: 34.5 °CAverage: 27.1 °C Power Supply (max.) 35.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.7 °C | FIRT 550-PocketMax. LoadIdle
31.4 °C27.3 °C27.8 °C 30.5 °C28.6 °C27.7 °C 30.7 °C30.2 °C30.1 °C
Maximum: 31.4 °CAverage: 29.4 °C
23 °C26.4 °C26.7 °C23.1 °C26.1 °C27.9 °C26.1 °C28 °C27.8 °C
Maximum: 28 °CAverage: 26.1 °C Power Supply (max.) 27.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.1 °C / 88 F and are therefore cool to the touch. (-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-3.5 °C / -6.3 F).
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE audio analysis(-) | not very loud speakers (61 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median(-) | mids are not linear (16% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(-) | overall sound is not linear (40% difference to median)Compared to same class» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)Compared to same class» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 91% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.22 / 0.42 WattIdle 5.4 / 6.8 / 7.3 Watt
Load
21.1 / 25.5 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)
3h 21min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UTN3060, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 41 Wh
376 min +87%Asus F540SA-XX087TN3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 33 Wh
329 min +64%Acer Aspire ES1-533-P7WAPentium N4200, HD Graphics 505, 36 Wh
321 min +60%Lenovo IdeaPad 100-15IBD5005U, HD Graphics 5500, 32 Wh
255 min +27%Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GEA8-7410, Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), 24 Wh
201 min
Pros+ 运行安静
+ 几乎不会变热
+ 高硬盘容量
+ 8GB工作内存
+ 无线网络AC标准Cons- 镜面TN屏幕
- 很短的电池续航
- 仅一年质保
- 仅高速以太网接口
- 不支持USB-C
- 接口布局不够合理
In review: Lenovo IdeaPad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de联想IdeaPad 110-15ACL是一台15.6寸基础办公笔记本电脑。它所采用的APU处理器可以满足简单办公应用和上网浏览的需要。这台设备在使用中几乎不会变热，可以保持安静运行。由于采用1TB机械硬盘，它的存储空间十分充裕。用户也可以自行更换升级固态硬盘，不过这需要打开机身底盖。它搭配的键盘可以满足家庭使用的需要。镜面、可视角度范围较窄的屏幕无法得到任何赞扬，不过考虑到价位它的表现也不是无法接受。
这是一台家用办公笔记本电脑，但在低售价设备中并不能脱颖而出，目前售价350欧元（约2558人民币）。
在这样的低价位上有所舍弃也无可厚非。这台笔记本电脑仅提供了高速以太网接口。而目前的标准配置是千兆网口。另外，它仅提供一年的质保，许多生产商为低价设备也提供了两年质保。必须提到的还有它低容量电池带来的极差续航表现。
这台IdeaPad在这个价位上可能很难吸引消费者的目光。例如联想另有一款相似的IdeaPad设备，搭配了更强的酷睿i3-6100U处理器和128GB固态硬盘，售价同样为350欧元（约2558人民币）。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE
- 03/26/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Chassis72 / 98 → 74%
Keyboard73%
Pointing Device81%
Connectivity36 / 80 → 46%
Weight62 / 20-67 → 89%
Battery71%
Display72%
Games Performance50 / 68 → 74%
Application Performance50 / 92 → 55%
Temperature94%
Noise93%
Audio30%
Camera35 / 85 → 42%
Average63%
74%
Office - Weighted Average
More articles related to this deviceLenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE (IdeaPad 110 Series)Review•联想 Ideapad 110-17IKB 80VK0001G...
Price comparison
Please share our article, every link counts!